I figured having the katamari display four scrolling objects on its surface would be adequate for the 2600 version. You could even have an unevenly-balanced katamari that way. Two interlaced players, of course.
But the difficult part would be designing a wide enough array of objects for it to actually be fun to play.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
Re: 2600...
Date: 2005-05-25 02:59 pm (UTC)I really ought to update my web page.... or move it off io.com. There are way better places to host it now.
Re: 2600...
Date: 2005-05-25 03:33 pm (UTC)It might be hard to duplicate the "object is attached to ball effect"
Maybe use a PF as the ball, so you have both players available for "stuff"? I dunno...it's a tough trail either way!
Re: 2600...
Date: 2005-05-26 03:13 am (UTC)But the difficult part would be designing a wide enough array of objects for it to actually be fun to play.