(no subject)
Feb. 7th, 2002 10:51 amThis article on history of character codes describes the system invented by Baudot to replace Morse code. His system was a manually-entered five-bit encoding system; operators would sit at a five-key keyboard and type in chords to send letters. Since five bits gives room for 32 symbols, and that's not enough for both letters and numbers, there was a "figures" and "letters" key which allowed one to shift between two sets of codes. Sounds confusing? The article explains:
It's not much worse than having to remember to press the SHIFT key on your computer keyboard to get the % character above the 5 key. The alternative was using a sixth finger, which was probably deemed to be even more cumbersome.Of course, it's not so hard to learn to type in Braille, which uses six "bits" which are typed in chords. But, I suppose Braille might have only been recently invented in Baudot's time.
no subject
Date: 2002-02-07 10:02 am (UTC)Also, I presume this guy's name is where the term "baud" came from in describing the modulation/demodulation algorithms used to transfer digital information over analog phone lines?
I believe...
Date: 2002-02-07 01:26 pm (UTC)I believe that TDDs (Teletype devices for
the deaf(??)) send modulated Baudot over the
lines. Baudot's funky.
I've been considering making a Twiddler-like
Baudot device. Well, I should say, I've often
considered it. The last time I seriously
considered it was in a sushi bar the night
(right before Hannah picked me up). 8^).
I'd never be able to deal with only the Baudot
supported characters though (cuz if I can't
code with it, why would I want it?). So, I was
considering a trinary or quaternary thumb.
I wanted to be able to have one in each hand
and learn how to type two things at once. 8^)
Hey.. now that they USB keyboards, this may be
slightly more plausible.... Hmmm....
Re: I believe...
Date: 2002-02-07 02:48 pm (UTC)Re: I believe...
Date: 2002-02-07 10:22 pm (UTC)were optimally laid out for people with only
one arm (different keyboard for left-handers
vs. right-handers). I'd go with one of his
keyboards (which I should be able to find
somewhere) before I went for a 1/2 QWERTY.
QWERTY was designed to slow typists down.
Dvorak designed his keyboards for optimum
efficiency and comfort for the English typist.
I'm a purist. 8^)
Re: I believe...
Date: 2002-02-07 11:00 pm (UTC)Didn't quite work for me.... :)
Re: I believe...
Date: 2002-02-07 11:19 pm (UTC)efficient typists would end up jamming the
typewriter by getting multiple hammers caught
together. (If you had a manual typewriter
around (when you were) a small child, then
you know the effect....) The disturbance
caused by having to unjam the thing caused
the overall typing speed to fall off dramatically
after a certain point.
The QWERTY keyboard was designed to put things
in unuseful places. For example, why isn't ``e''
(the most common letter in the English language)
in the home row or at least on your index finger?
Unfortunately for the devious typewriter makers,
QWERTY keyboards. But, the typewriter makers
had some time to smooth out some of the mechanics
to cause fewer jams.
Anyhow... it's bedtime for me....
Re: I believe...
Date: 2002-02-08 05:40 am (UTC)But at this point, people can type 90+ words per minute with the QWERTY keyboard. Dvorak typists can get a little edge, but not enough to make every touch typist in America learn a new standard layout.