(no subject)
Nov. 22nd, 2003 08:45 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
unbibiumThere is one thing I don't understand about this Michael Jackson case.
See, when someone comes forth and alleges that a Catholic priest abused him, usually a few other people come forth and say "me too", right? Especially if said priest has been getting away with it for a long time.
With Michael Jackson, this did not happen, either in the previous allegation, nor this one (yet).
Why would multiple allegations surface against a priest, who lives in one community for a very long time, but only isolated allegations against Michael Jackson, who meets busloads of kids at his amusement park home every week?
Am I right, or am I out "BICYCLING"?
See, when someone comes forth and alleges that a Catholic priest abused him, usually a few other people come forth and say "me too", right? Especially if said priest has been getting away with it for a long time.
With Michael Jackson, this did not happen, either in the previous allegation, nor this one (yet).
Why would multiple allegations surface against a priest, who lives in one community for a very long time, but only isolated allegations against Michael Jackson, who meets busloads of kids at his amusement park home every week?
Am I right, or am I out "BICYCLING"?
no subject
Date: 2003-11-22 08:01 pm (UTC)Jackson is likely paying a lot of people to be quiet.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: