Oct. 1st, 2007
month-to-month
Oct. 1st, 2007 09:42 amIs it just me, or have apartment complexes started to be a bit more demanding when it comes to lease agreements?
In 2000, when I went month-to-month, it cost me an extra $25 a month. Piece of cake.
In 2001, I spent a little time on a month-to-month lease too. That was an extra $50 a month.
In 2007, I'm paying for October outside of a lease agreement, and it's costing me an extra $100. That's peanuts compared to what they'd charge me if I broke my lease.
I'm hearing reports that some apartments' month-to-month rates are $250 higher.
I suppose if we're taking this sort of abuse from our cell phone companies, why should landlords miss out?
In 2000, when I went month-to-month, it cost me an extra $25 a month. Piece of cake.
In 2001, I spent a little time on a month-to-month lease too. That was an extra $50 a month.
In 2007, I'm paying for October outside of a lease agreement, and it's costing me an extra $100. That's peanuts compared to what they'd charge me if I broke my lease.
I'm hearing reports that some apartments' month-to-month rates are $250 higher.
I suppose if we're taking this sort of abuse from our cell phone companies, why should landlords miss out?
Damn decisions.
Oct. 1st, 2007 12:36 pmHey, know what? Turns out it's not too late for me to sign another six months at my current Brookstone apartment. And I get six weeks free rent if I do so, and that takes the edge off the rent hike.
So it turns out I now have five hours to decide whether to stay or go. Instead of relaxing.
Incidentally, moving companies don't even give you a hint on their websites. You have to give them your name and phone number and vitals, and they call you with an estimate.
So it turns out I now have five hours to decide whether to stay or go. Instead of relaxing.
Incidentally, moving companies don't even give you a hint on their websites. You have to give them your name and phone number and vitals, and they call you with an estimate.